Judicial Ethics and Moral Reasoning in Legal Philosophy: A Deontological and Utilitarian Review of the Harvey Moeis Case

Authors

  • Rasji Rasji Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Akhirudin Akhir Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53748/jbms.v5i1.113

Keywords:

Corruption, Ethics, Judicial Decision, Legal Philosophy, Morality

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the alignment between judicial decisions and ethical principles through the lens of legal philosophy, using the Harvey Moeis corruption case as a focal point. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with juridical-normative and philosophical approaches. It involves the analysis of judicial decisions, legal norms, and ethical codes such as KEPPH, combined with theoretical frameworks from deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. The study finds that while the court’s decision attempted to uphold justice, concerns remain regarding judicial integrity and impartiality. The ruling emphasizes deterrence but reflects the need for stronger adherence to ethical and philosophical principles. This study contributes a philosophical-ethical analysis of a contemporary judicial case in Indonesia, highlighting the moral dimension of legal reasoning often overlooked in procedural legal analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bentham, J., Mills, J., & Mill, J. S. (1935). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Essays on government, jurisprudence, liberty of the press, and law of nations. On liberty. Utilitarianism (P. P. Wheelwright, Ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.

Kant, I. (2000). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (A. W. Wood, Ed.). New Haven & London: Yale University Press. https://archive.org/details/immanuel-kant-groundwork-for-the-metaphysics-of-morals/page/n3/mode/2up

Ketua Mahkamah Agung; Ketua Komisi Yudisial. (2014). Kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim. Komisi Yudisial. https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/storage/assets/uploads/files/Kode-Etik-dan-Pedoman-Perilaku-Hakim.pdf

Ni’am, S., & Ramadhan, A. (2025, February 13). Hukuman Harvey Moeis diperberat dari 6,5 tahun jadi 20 tahun penjara. Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/02/13/10150531/hukuman-harvey-moeis-diperberat-dari-65-tahun-jadi-20-tahun-penjara?lgn_method=google&google_btn=onetap

Prayoga, T., Basry, Y. K., & Krisnan, J. (2022). Analisis putusan pidana dalam kasus korupsi Pinangki Sirna Malasari ditinjau dari asas keadilan. Jatijajar Law Review, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26753/jlr.v1i2.756

Darmawan, D. A., & Wijaya, A. U. (2024). The theory of opened legal policy in Constitutional Court decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(1), 45–57.

Harini, M., & Rahmat, D. (2025). The role of judges in legal discovery and the code of ethics. Journal Evidence of Law, 4(1), 1–12.

Rahmatullah, I. (2021). Utilitarianism in legal philosophy: Concept and actualization in Indonesian law. Adalah: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i2.22026

Rayfindratama, A. D. (2023). Judicial freedom in delivering court verdicts. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara, 1(2), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-26

How to Cite

Rasji, R., & Akhir, A. (2025). Judicial Ethics and Moral Reasoning in Legal Philosophy: A Deontological and Utilitarian Review of the Harvey Moeis Case. Journal of Business, Management, and Social Studies, 5(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.53748/jbms.v5i1.113