Judicial Ethics and Moral Reasoning in Legal Philosophy: A Deontological and Utilitarian Review of the Harvey Moeis Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53748/jbms.v5i1.113Keywords:
Corruption, Ethics, Judicial Decision, Legal Philosophy, MoralityAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the alignment between judicial decisions and ethical principles through the lens of legal philosophy, using the Harvey Moeis corruption case as a focal point. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with juridical-normative and philosophical approaches. It involves the analysis of judicial decisions, legal norms, and ethical codes such as KEPPH, combined with theoretical frameworks from deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. The study finds that while the court’s decision attempted to uphold justice, concerns remain regarding judicial integrity and impartiality. The ruling emphasizes deterrence but reflects the need for stronger adherence to ethical and philosophical principles. This study contributes a philosophical-ethical analysis of a contemporary judicial case in Indonesia, highlighting the moral dimension of legal reasoning often overlooked in procedural legal analysis.
Downloads
References
Bentham, J., Mills, J., & Mill, J. S. (1935). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Essays on government, jurisprudence, liberty of the press, and law of nations. On liberty. Utilitarianism (P. P. Wheelwright, Ed.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.
Kant, I. (2000). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (A. W. Wood, Ed.). New Haven & London: Yale University Press. https://archive.org/details/immanuel-kant-groundwork-for-the-metaphysics-of-morals/page/n3/mode/2up
Ketua Mahkamah Agung; Ketua Komisi Yudisial. (2014). Kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim. Komisi Yudisial. https://www.komisiyudisial.go.id/storage/assets/uploads/files/Kode-Etik-dan-Pedoman-Perilaku-Hakim.pdf
Ni’am, S., & Ramadhan, A. (2025, February 13). Hukuman Harvey Moeis diperberat dari 6,5 tahun jadi 20 tahun penjara. Kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2025/02/13/10150531/hukuman-harvey-moeis-diperberat-dari-65-tahun-jadi-20-tahun-penjara?lgn_method=google&google_btn=onetap
Prayoga, T., Basry, Y. K., & Krisnan, J. (2022). Analisis putusan pidana dalam kasus korupsi Pinangki Sirna Malasari ditinjau dari asas keadilan. Jatijajar Law Review, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26753/jlr.v1i2.756
Darmawan, D. A., & Wijaya, A. U. (2024). The theory of opened legal policy in Constitutional Court decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(1), 45–57.
Harini, M., & Rahmat, D. (2025). The role of judges in legal discovery and the code of ethics. Journal Evidence of Law, 4(1), 1–12.
Rahmatullah, I. (2021). Utilitarianism in legal philosophy: Concept and actualization in Indonesian law. Adalah: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i2.22026
Rayfindratama, A. D. (2023). Judicial freedom in delivering court verdicts. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara, 1(2), 1–17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Business, Management, and Social Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.